In Jean-Paul Sartre’s play, “No
Exit,” existentialist philosophy is key; the theme is “hell is other people.”
This idea implies that other people are the basis of our limitations of our
thinking. Certainly, people can do and think as they please and create their
own personal sense of reality, but they will allow other people to limit them.
As for Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, Plato seems to feel that the limitations
of our thoughts are only natural and uncontrollable, yet it is completely up to
us, ourselves, to break free of these boundaries. It is our choice to abandon
our caves (our natural ignorance), and also our choice to stay outside in the
sunshine of enlightenment. Instead of other people being the source of our limits, our limits are
uncontrollable and we are in charge of overcoming them. Both philosophers seem
to other rather simple-sounding solutions. Plato offers the solution of leaving
the cave of your own free will, turning your face to the sun and allowing your
eyes to acclimate to a new reality of insight. Sartre’s solution could be as
simple as not allowing other people to become hell for you, seeing as you have
the ability to frame your own sense of reality.
Both pieces make use of extended
metaphor, and you can say that both are examples of allegory (alright, it is
pretty much a given when you look at Plato’s work). The storylines themselves
are metaphorical, and many of the actions/objects/ideas within them are
symbolic as well. The main extended metaphors were Plato’s cave and Sartres’
hell (that room with the offensive style of furniture). These objects, these places, became characters
within the pieces. All that the cave dwellers/prisoners have, and all that
Garcin, Inez, and Estelle have is the space that they dwell within. It is
constantly present, physically and within their minds (except for when the cave
dwellers free themselves; then their lives become so much more). Eh, I
apologize if this little analysis isn’t quite up to snuff. It’s been a busy
week for procrastinators everywhere, I’m sure.
Very accurate observation about the procrastinators. Also, very astute observation of limits being uncontrollable instead of fixed by the people we are around.
ReplyDelete