Thursday, November 29, 2012

Thinking Outside the Box



In Jean-Paul Sartre’s play, “No Exit,” existentialist philosophy is key; the theme is “hell is other people.” This idea implies that other people are the basis of our limitations of our thinking. Certainly, people can do and think as they please and create their own personal sense of reality, but they will allow other people to limit them. As for Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, Plato seems to feel that the limitations of our thoughts are only natural and uncontrollable, yet it is completely up to us, ourselves, to break free of these boundaries. It is our choice to abandon our caves (our natural ignorance), and also our choice to stay outside in the sunshine of enlightenment. Instead of other people being the source of our limits, our limits are uncontrollable and we are in charge of overcoming them. Both philosophers seem to other rather simple-sounding solutions. Plato offers the solution of leaving the cave of your own free will, turning your face to the sun and allowing your eyes to acclimate to a new reality of insight. Sartre’s solution could be as simple as not allowing other people to become hell for you, seeing as you have the ability to frame your own sense of reality.
Both pieces make use of extended metaphor, and you can say that both are examples of allegory (alright, it is pretty much a given when you look at Plato’s work). The storylines themselves are metaphorical, and many of the actions/objects/ideas within them are symbolic as well. The main extended metaphors were Plato’s cave and Sartres’ hell (that room with the offensive style of furniture).  These objects, these places, became characters within the pieces. All that the cave dwellers/prisoners have, and all that Garcin, Inez, and Estelle have is the space that they dwell within. It is constantly present, physically and within their minds (except for when the cave dwellers free themselves; then their lives become so much more). Eh, I apologize if this little analysis isn’t quite up to snuff. It’s been a busy week for procrastinators everywhere, I’m sure.

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

1984--Literature Analysis, Character Questions

Whoops, sorry everybody (is anyone actually reading this part of the blog?). It seems that I forgot to put up the second half of my lit analysis yesterday. I kept putting it off so I could fix a few questions and...well, hey, this is starting to sound like an excuse. Here we go:



1.       Direct Characterization:
·         “In the ramifications of Party doctrine [Julia] had not the faintest interest.”
·         “[Winston] moved over to the window: a smallish, frail figure, the meagerness of his body merely emphasized by the blue overalls which were the uniform of the Party. His hair was very fair, his face naturally sanguine, his skin roughened by coarse soap and blunt razor blades and the cold of the winter that had just ended.”
Indirect Characterization:
·          Eh, well this is awkward. Most of the book is blatant, direct characterization (as it goes along with the tone of the book). I feel like I can't find a good example without rereading the whole book. So...yes.
         
2. I'd have to say no. Orwell's style, his syntax, his diction--I can't say I noted a change as he spoke of different characters...He described them all in a straightforward, almost joyless manner (again, the tone!), and describes many of the same aspects/characteristics at first mention.
3.  Winston Smith is a dynamic character. He began the book as a tentative rebel against the Party, met Julia and become a more outright rebel, then ended up “reintegrated” back into society so that he loved the Party, Ingsoc, and Big Brother, and was apathetic towards Julia.
4. In the case of Winston Smith, I feel that I have met a person. (Not so much Julia, though.) I got to know him well throughout the book, and he seems rather easy to relate to (I'm guessing most of us feel like a rebel against the norm at least one time or another in our lifetimes).

Monday, November 26, 2012

1984--Literature Analysis, General Questions



1.       1984 is a dystopian story about a man named Winston Smith, who is living in nightmarish society that seems to reflect our own more and more every day. The government is over controlling and numbs all of the public of Oceania, the world power that was once Europe. The totalitarian government controls the people with propaganda, fear and, basically, hypnotism (we all know that “Big Brother is watching you,” phrase from the posters). Winston works in the records department of the “Ministry of Truth;” however, one day, he begins his silent resistance by recording some of his rebellious thoughts in a little (illegal) diary. His resistance is joined by a fiery rebel named Julia, who he falls in love with; to paraphrase the Muse song I posted a little while ago, “love is their resistance.” Together, in their little hideaways out of the prying telescreen’s view, they begin to question the system in place (“Ingsoc”—English Socialism), eventually meeting up with the mysterious O’Brien as their interest in the rebel group, the Brotherhood, develops. Sadly, the Thought Police catches Winston and Julia—they are tortured (it turns out O’Brien was behind his torture) and “reintegrated” before being released back into their dreadful society. ..Later on, Winston is taken back to be tortured, but he cries out, “Do it to Julia!” (the torture involved his greatest fear: rats) Winston is released again, loving Big Brother just like the rest of them.
2.       After studying bits and pieces of this novel in English classes over the past four years, I’ve heard quite a few excellent themes, but I’ll just stick with rebellion and resistance. (I feel like I say that same thing every time I’m asked to write about a story’s theme.) 1984 is a story of rebellion. Winston rebels against the system with his journal, he rebels with his brief memories of the past, with his constant questioning in his mind. When he meets Julia, as mentioned before, their love, their meetings—those become acts of rebellion. Even Julia’s sexuality was her rebellion (her first and main form of resistance): “You’re only a rebel from the waist downwards.” (Woah, there Winston.) Everything the two did was in the interest of revolution.
3.       Orwell’s tone in 1984 is not terribly ornate or fancy, which reflects the dreary and utterly austere plot and setting of the story.
Examples include:
·         “The hallway smelt of boiling cabbage and old rag mats. At one end of it a colored poster, too large for indoor display, had been tacked to the wall. It depicted simply an enormous face, more than a meter wide…” [Book one/chapter one/pg. 1]
·         “He sat back. A sense of complete helplessness had descended upon him. To begin, he did not know with any certainty that it was 1984.” [Book one/chapter one/pg. 6]
·         “He walked on. The bomb had demolished a group of houses two hundred meters up the street…Apart from the bloody stump, the hand was so completely whitened as to resemble a plaster cast./He kicked the thing into the gutter, and then, to avoid the crowd, turned down a side street to the right. Within three or four minutes he was out of the area which the bomb had affected, the sordid swarming life of the streets was going on as though nothing had happened.” [Book one/chapter eight/pg. 84]
4.             The glass paperweight that Winston bought in Mr. Carrington’s shop is a symbol of the past; something that has no basis in reality during Winston’s time. The picture of the church and the accompanying tune that Mr. Carrington and a couple of other characters knew also seemed to be symbolic of another time.
Flashbacks were also employed within the plot as Winston remembered and dreamt of his childhood; the regime might try to erase the past but they couldn’t erase the torturous memories that Winston held onto.
Winston dreams that he will meet O’Brien in “the place where there is no darkness.”  This concept serves a couple of different purposes in the novel. It is foreshadowing—Winston does end up in that place with O’Brien—but it is also a source of irony—that place where there is no darkness is not what it sounds like it would be.
Julia’s red Junior Anti-Sex League sash is meant as a symbol of her devotion to the Party’s causes, though she practices quite the opposite. I read somewhere that it becomes a symbol of Julia’s duality, and frankly, I just really like the way that was worded. Couldn’t have said it better myself.
Winston’s memories of his mother seem to be representative of his feelings of guilt. This becomes very evident starting with his memory of stealing his baby sister’s last bit of chocolate as a child, right before his mother and sister vanished.
The backwards ways of the Party were all great examples of irony: “War is peace/Freedom is slavery/Ignorance is strength.” Endless wars against a common enemy kept people comfortable and together.  Big Brother was also ironic; his presence was supposed to intimidate you, yet also comfort you. He was your Big Brother, why would he want anything but to take care of you?

"Imagine" by A Perfect Circle

There were several songs in today's class lineup of tunes, all of them familiar, including John Lennon's "Imagine." The above song is a cover of that immortal melody--and a darn good one. Not all song covers do the original justice, but this is probably my all-time favorite cover of anything (but I do feel that KoRn's version of "Another Brick in the Wall" is actually pretty cool) because it introduces a different kind of beauty to the message and some original drama to the delivery. Enjoy, Imagine, by A Perfect Circle., off of eMotive. (Remember lead James Maynard Keenan and guitarist Billy Howerdel from Tool?)

Monday, November 19, 2012

Some More Shadow-Related Tunes

I figured I'd add some more music relating to today's tunes' shadow theme (going along with the allegory of the Cave). "Shadow of the Season" by the Screaming Trees, off of Sweet Oblivion.

Thursday, November 8, 2012

1984--Resistance

In honor of my reading the novel 1984 by George Orwell (finally), here is a song by Muse inspired by the book. Here y'all go, Resistance by Muse, off of their album, The Resistance.

Big Question

Many months ago, we were learning about brains in anatomy class, and we were asked to hypothesize about what function, chemical, etc., in the brain distinguishes our imagination from reality (i.e., we know the difference between imagining that we are walking down the street and actually walking down the street). Though I put my little theory down on paper, I'm still not satisfied and I've been thinking about it ever since that assignment. So...

My Big Question is: How do we tell the difference between imagination and reality?

One must take into consideration not only the average brain but also those with schizophrenia or those that experience hallucinations or any other issue that makes it so they cannot distinguish between reality and imagination. It's not as simple as it might sound at first...It would be nice to see some theories and even better to see an answer...though I'm not sure there is one. Yet.

Monday, November 5, 2012

If I were president...

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-kjdjmixdTM

Yes, yes, I know, it's not a link. But the blogger app is very limited, and I just really felt the need to post this, seeing as tomorrow's "judgement day." So here ya go, folks, copy, paste and enjoy "If I Were President" by Wyclef Jean.

Hamlet

My essay is currently frustrating the bejeezus out of me, so here, a Hamlet-related comic I found!

Vocab List #11

Affinity- relationship by marriage
Bilious- of or indicative of a peevish ill nature disposition
Cognate- of the same nature
Corollary- A proposition inferred Immediately from a proved proposition with little or no additional proof
Cul-de-sac - a pouch
Derring-do- a daring action
Divination- The art or practice that seeks to foretell future events or discover hidden knowledge due to the interpretation of omens
Elixir- A substance capable of prolonging life indefinitely
Folderol- a useless accessory
Gamut- an entire range or series
Hoi polloi- the General populace
Ineffable- incapable of being expressed in words
Lucubration- to study by night
Mnemonic- intended to assist memory
Obloquy- abusive language
Parameter- an independent variable used to express the coordinates of variable point and functions of them
Pundit- a learned man
Risible- provoking laughter
Symptomatic- having the characteristics of a certain disease but arising of a different cause
Volte-face- a reversal in policy

This week's vocabulary is just of a "copy-paste" function. Hopefully I will keep my promise to myself to do my sentences later, though it will be pretty annoying to do on my phone.

Thursday, November 1, 2012

AP Hamlet PLN

1. "Hamlet & Heroism" at Cambridge:

 This was the first, and the best course I stumbled upon during my search. The entire course is focused on Hamlet; it spends time analyzing his character in many different ways. It looks at Hamlet as a hero, and "no approach to the tragedy is ruled out."

2.  "Reading, Writing, and Printing" at University of Pennsylvania:

This seminar looks at the technical and artistic points of "Hamlet" as well as other works. There is not much explanation....


3. AP Literature and Composition at Bartow High School:
This AP course was neatly outlined in PDF syllabus, so of course I'm going to give it props for being neat and tidy. It also had several pages of questions and topics of thought for certain works that the class would be going over (obviously, they're pretty familiar). 

4. Hamlet on OpenUW presented by University of Washington: 

This course...Not the most intellectual or deep class, looking at the sample quiz that they gave. But I could be wrong. Frankly, I've become a little desperate; I'm having a hard time finding valid courses and I have yet to find someone who has found 15 or so courses. Hopefully I'll get some feedback from someone and come back later to add to this. But, for now, I must study.